Other hypotheses of global warming
The extent of the scientific consensus on global warming—that “most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to have been attributable to human activities”—has been investigated: In the journal Science in December 2004, Dr Naomi Oreskes published a study of the abstracts of the 928 refereed scientific articles in the ISI citation database identified with the keywords “global climate change” and published from 1993–2003. This study concluded that 75% of the 928 articles either explicitly or implicitly accepted the consensus view—the remainder of the articles covered methods or paleoclimate and did not take any stance on recent climate change. The study did not report how many of the 928 abstracts explicitly accepted the hypothesis of human-induced warming, but none of the 928 articles surveyed accepted any other hypothesis[1].
Contrasting with the consensus view, other hypotheses have been proposed to explain all or most of the observed increase in global temperatures. Some of these hypotheses (listed here without comment on their validity or lack thereof) include:
- The warming is within the range of natural variation.
- The warming is a consequence of coming out of a prior cool period, namely the Little Ice Age.
- The warming is primarily a result of variances in solar irradiance, possibly via modulation of cloud cover. It is similar in concept to the operating principles of the Wilson cloud chamber, but on a global scale where earth’s atmosphere acts as the cloud chamber and the cosmic rays catalyze the production of cloud condensation nuclei.
- The observed warming actually reflects the Urban Heat Island, as most readings are done in heavily populated areas which are expanding with growing population.
Comments Off